|
Register •
FAQ
• Search • Login
|
|
It is currently Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:31 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
seawildearth
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 2:11 pm Posts: 8 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
 Irix 15mm f2.4
Looks like a sweet and economical option for the super wide department, compared to the price tag of the Nikkor 14-24 f2.8 or the Canon 11-24mm. I particularly like the idea of a focus lock and the audible confirmation for Infinity focus point. Will be interesting to see how received, and great for the 5DS(r) too. http://irixlens.com/15mm.phpCheers, Mark.
|
Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:08 pm |
|
 |
scotchtape
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:24 pm Posts: 284
|
 Re: Irix 15mm f2.4
Hopefully it is a "perfect" lens. Tamron 15-30mm is only about $200 - $300 more and pretty good so... not sure if I would get the Irix unless it really is phenomenal.
I have both Tamron and Nikon UWA zooms, like them both. Corners could still be better though, so interested in seeing lens reviews for this bad boy.
|
Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:38 am |
|
 |
seawildearth
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 2:11 pm Posts: 8 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
 Re: Irix 15mm f2.4
I just sold my Nikkor 14-24mm and in flux with regards to where I'm gonna go DSLR wise. I was thinking Sony but still not convinced. Apparently there will be some update about the continued Sony mirrorless evolution in August, some think an announcement of the continuation of the A series with what some tout as being the A9 with, again, a projected potential that it could be a 72MP beastie. The whole Sony battery longevity issue would need serious attention IMHO, this over third party solutions that increase backcountry loads on ever ageing legs!
It's either that or I continue my Canon affair. Plus side to that is I have the glass, the batteries and the grips etc seeing as I also recently sold just the 5D3 body. Could be the 5Dsr? Either way I think this glass will fill a niche slot and at that price it should be a good contender. Slightly cropping the corners if CA is problematic but by all looks some early tests show it to be negligible.
Decisions, decisions. Cheers.
|
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:18 pm |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|